<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Context over Consistency?</title>
	<link>http://www.pleasetakenote.com/2007/06/29/context-over-consistency/</link>
	<description>Art, Design, Music &#038; Culture Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: nuzzaci</title>
		<link>http://www.pleasetakenote.com/2007/06/29/context-over-consistency/#comment-342</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pleasetakenote.com/2007/06/29/context-over-consistency/#comment-342</guid>
					<description>Yeah, and looking at it again — the shift button. When did url's become case sensitive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, and looking at it again — the shift button. When did url&#8217;s become case sensitive?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dom</title>
		<link>http://www.pleasetakenote.com/2007/06/29/context-over-consistency/#comment-341</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.pleasetakenote.com/2007/06/29/context-over-consistency/#comment-341</guid>
					<description>At first glance I totally brought the blog post from 37 signals, and I still do in part - Apple's customisation of the keyboard layout was the right thing to do on the iPhone's behalf. This smart, clever detail change to the interface that serves the user is a good thing. But after speaking with some friends here I am not convinced that a minor tweak qualifies for the 'great example of context over consistency' certification?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first glance I totally brought the blog post from 37 signals, and I still do in part - Apple&#8217;s customisation of the keyboard layout was the right thing to do on the iPhone&#8217;s behalf. This smart, clever detail change to the interface that serves the user is a good thing. But after speaking with some friends here I am not convinced that a minor tweak qualifies for the &#8216;great example of context over consistency&#8217; certification?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
